Not a model.
A decade of clinical truth
compressed into four engines.
The CRI was built because regenerative medicine in Southeast Asia operates without accountability. We changed that — one biomarker, one patient, one outcome at a time.
We have operated in this space long enough to witness harm caused not by malice, but by the absence of measurable standards. Clinics promise outcomes. Patients pay. Neither party has a framework to determine whether biology is actually responding.
The CRI was not created as a product. It was created as a corrective. A proprietary scoring architecture that replaces opinion with evidence, replaces anecdote with longitudinal data, and replaces financial incentive with biological accountability.
If we cannot demonstrate measurable progress toward a defined biological endpoint, we do not treat. That is not a policy. That is the engine itself executing its decision logic.
From Excel pivot tables
to a clinical intelligence system.
The CRI did not emerge from a whiteboard. It was distilled from a decade of raw clinical data — initially tracked in spreadsheets, then in statistical models, then formalised through graduate-level biostatistics and AI methodology training.
The Four Engines of the Close Regenerative Index
Synthesises a minimum of 10 biomarkers across metabolic, inflammatory, hormonal, and cellular health axes into a single convergent score. Unlike standard reference-range interpretation, the BCE evaluates biomarker relationships — identifying clinical patterns that individual values cannot reveal. Derived from population analytics across 100,000+ panels.
Measures the rate of biological change rather than static values at a single point in time. The RVI computes trajectory across serial panels, distinguishing genuine regenerative response from assay noise or placebo drift. This is the engine that determines whether a protocol is actually working — and how fast.
Every clinical biomarker carries measurement uncertainty. The BCC applies Bayesian probability modelling to assign confidence intervals to each CRI score — distinguishing high-confidence findings from borderline signals that require additional data before clinical action. This engine is the reason we say no to treatment when others would say yes.
Blood panels are episodic. Biology is continuous. The WIM integrates HRV, sleep architecture, VO₂ proxy, glucose variability, and activity data from clinical-grade wearables — Apple Watch, Oura, Garmin, WHOOP — into the CRI score, filling the 23.5-hour gap between blood draws with longitudinal physiological signal.
Built on defensible science,
not wellness consensus.
What this system demands of us.
All day long.
The Close Regenerative Index exists because we believed — and still believe — that a patient's biological improvement is the only metric that matters. Every line of code in these engines, every biomarker weight, every Bayesian prior, was set in service of that belief. Not for a pitch deck. Not for a valuation. For the person sitting in front of us whose body is asking a question we are now, finally, equipped to answer with precision.
Ready to calculate your CRI score?
Enter your biomarkers and receive your personalised longevity score instantly.
Calculate My CRI Score →